Share:

CITY STREET over DRAINAGE CANAL

Map 

Coordinates:
+30.36018, -91.10597
30°21'37" N, 91°06'21" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CITY STREET over DRAINAGE CANAL
Structure number:611730216910631
Location:LOG MILE 00.01
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:5.9 ft. [1.8 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1948
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,303 [as of 1980]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Operating rating:43.6 tons [39.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:80.7

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
February 201680.7Fair6 out of 10FO2303
February 201477.7Fair6 out of 10FO2303
February 201277.7Fair6 out of 10FO2303
March 201077.7Good8 out of 10FO2303
March 200877.7Good8 out of 10FO2303
April 200677.7Good8 out of 10FO2303
July 200477.7Good8 out of 10FO2303
August 200277.7Good8 out of 10FO2303
August 200077.7Good8 out of 10FO2303
July 199877.7Good8 out of 10FO2303
May 199677.7Fair6 out of 10FO2303
July 199377.8Fair6 out of 10FO2303
June 199177.8Fair6 out of 10FO2303