+30.40689, -91.16480
30°24'25" N, 91°09'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:611730249910981
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Total length:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.3 ft. [13.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:80.1 ft. [24.4 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1950
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:8,820 [as of 1979]
Structural appraisal:Unknown [*]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:76.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$232,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
June 201776.4Good7 out of 10FO8820
June 201576.4Good7 out of 10FO8820
July 201376.4Good7 out of 10FO8820
July 201176.4Good7 out of 10FO8820
July 200976.4Good7 out of 10FO8820
July 200776.4Good7 out of 10FO8820
July 200576.4Good7 out of 10FO8820
August 200376.4Good7 out of 10FO8820
October 200176.4Good7 out of 10FO8820
November 199976.4Good7 out of 10FO8820
January 199877.4Good7 out of 10FO8820
May 199677.4Fair6 out of 10FO8820
June 199377.3Fair6 out of 10FO8820
May 199177.3Fair6 out of 10FO8820