HWY LAMB ST over WATER TEN MILE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+41.93306, -71.2878741°55'59" N, 71°17'16" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HWY LAMB ST over WATER TEN MILE RIVER |
Structure number: | A160123L2MUNNBI |
Old structure number: | TWN602003100 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 1.8MI E OF RT.95 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Total length: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 39.7 ft. [12.1 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1905 |
Year reconstructed: | 1993 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 4,655 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 76.4 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
Estimated cost of work: | $890,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4655 | 76.4 |
February 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 6700 | 76.2 |
February 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 6000 | 76.3 |
February 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 13600 | 75.3 |
February 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 9050 | 75.9 |
February 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 4100 | 65.4 |
February 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1500 | 82.6 |
February 2004 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 5600 | 74.3 |
February 2002 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 5000 | 74.3 |
February 2000 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 4200 | 74.4 |
February 1996 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 5000 | 67.8 |
February 1994 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 2600 | 71.8 |
November 1992 | Fair | - | - | Satisfactory | 175 | 31.9 |
July 1991 | Fair | - | - | Satisfactory | 175 | 31.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 362 | 362 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Prestressed Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 1,446 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,047 | 1,047 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Masonry Abutment | linear ft. | 140 | 0 | 85 | 55 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 81 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 0 |