Share:

HWY SUMMER ST over WATER FORT POINT CHANNEL

Map

Coordinates:
+42.35101, -71.05205
42°21'04" N, 71°03'07" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:HWY SUMMER ST over WATER FORT POINT CHANNEL
Structure number:B16031389MUNNBI
Location:OVER FT POINT CHANNEL
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:89.6 ft. [27.3 m]
Total length:502.0 ft. [153.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:13.5 ft. [4.1 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1899
Year reconstructed:1998
Historic significance:Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:6
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:27,400 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:57.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$25,217,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2016FairSatisfactoryGoodFair2740057.9
August 2014FairSatisfactoryGoodFair2650058.0
August 2012FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory2650069.8
August 2010FairGoodGoodSatisfactory2650069.8
August 2008FairGoodGoodSatisfactory2630069.8
August 2006FairGoodGoodSatisfactory2600069.8
August 2004FairGoodGoodSatisfactory2450070.0
August 2002GoodGoodVery GoodGood2150073.3
August 2000GoodGoodVery GoodGood2390073.0

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beamlinear ft.7,5157,515000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.59,37159,371000
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.38,20837,46274600
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.26,16825,20696200
Substructure
Masonry Pier Walllinear ft.40324715420
Masonry Abutmentlinear ft.2021663600
Reinforced Concrete Pileeach1861020
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.5034881500
Joints
Compression Jointlinear ft.152767600
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearingeach1501163310
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.2,0082,008000