HWY WILLIAMS ST over COMB AMTRAK/MBTA & ORNG
Map
Coordinates:
+42.30757, -71.1093842°18'27" N, 71°06'34" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HWY WILLIAMS ST over COMB AMTRAK/MBTA & ORNG |
Structure number: | B160994VGMBTNBI |
Location: | BTWN ARMORY & EVERETT ST |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 59.1 ft. [18.0 m] |
Total length: | 98.1 ft. [29.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.3 ft. [12.9 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 6° |
Owner: | Other State Agencies [21] |
Year built: | 1982 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 700 [as of 1997] |
Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 90.4 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,567,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 700 | 90.4 |
April 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 700 | 90.4 |
April 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 700 | 90.4 |
June 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 700 | 90.4 |
July 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 700 | 90.4 |
April 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 700 | 90.4 |
March 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 700 | 90.4 |
March 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 700 | 90.4 |
April 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 700 | 90.4 |
April 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 700 | 90.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Deck |
Other Material Slab | sq. ft. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |