Share:

HWY TRM B DEP RD over HWY LOGAN TRM B ARR RD

Map

Coordinates:
+42.36333, -71.01917
42°21'48" N, 71°01'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:HWY TRM B DEP RD over HWY LOGAN TRM B ARR RD
Structure number:B16293B34MPANBI
Location:TERM B DEPART
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:59.4 ft. [18.1 m]
Total length:1870.5 ft. [570.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:41.7 ft. [12.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:65.3 ft. [19.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:19.7 ft. [6.0 m]
Owner:Other State Agencies [21]
Year built:1979
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:72
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:23.8 tons [21.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:14.2 tons [12.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:53.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$97,298,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
October 201653.0FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO-
September 201453.0FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactoryFO-
February 201263.0GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO-
March 201152.0FairFairFairSatisfactoryFO-
November 200738.0PoorFairPoorSatisfactorySD-