HWY PLEASANT ST over WATER MUDDY COVE BROOK
Map
Coordinates:
+41.80953, -71.1196941°48'34" N, 71°07'11" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HWY PLEASANT ST over WATER MUDDY COVE BROOK |
Structure number: | D080023L9MUNNBI |
Old structure number: | 3L9TWN611002100 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | AT INT OF MUDDY COVE LN |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Total length: | 30.2 ft. [9.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 35.8 ft. [10.9 m] |
Skew angle: | 27° |
Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
Year built: | 1914 |
Year reconstructed: | 1949 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 900 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 59.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $557,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 900 | 59.0 |
March 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2069 | 56.8 |
March 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2069 | 56.8 |
March 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 4000 | 56.4 |
March 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 4000 | 56.4 |
March 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1900 | 57.8 |
March 2006 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1200 | 57.9 |
March 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 600 | 59.1 |
March 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2300 | 58.2 |
March 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 2000 | 60.2 |
March 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 2000 | 60.2 |
March 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 600 | 63.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 270 | 92 | 157 | 21 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 1,090 | 840 | 50 | 200 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 970 | 520 | 450 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 120 | 64 | 50 | 6 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 61 | 0 | 59 | 2 | 0 |