HWY WHITTENTN ST over WATER MILL RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+41.92340, -71.1060041°55'24" N, 71°06'22" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HWY WHITTENTN ST over WATER MILL RIVER |
Structure number: | T010203K8MUNNBI |
Old structure number: | 3K8MUN641021100 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | AT WHITTENTON MILL |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 49.2 ft. [15.0 m] |
Total length: | 54.8 ft. [16.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 31.5 ft. [9.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 45.9 ft. [14.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1930 |
Year reconstructed: | 2007 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,400 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 97.6 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
Estimated cost of work: | $805,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1400 | 97.6 |
August 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 4200 | 92.6 |
August 2013 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 7300 | 90.2 |
August 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 7300 | 90.2 |
August 2009 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 7300 | 90.2 |
March 2008 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 5700 | 29.3 |
October 2006 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Poor | 4300 | 26.6 |
October 2004 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Poor | 4300 | 40.8 |
October 2002 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Poor | 3100 | 41.2 |
October 2000 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Poor | 3100 | 41.2 |
October 1998 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Poor | 3600 | 54.1 |
November 1996 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Fair | 2000 | 61.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 296 | 296 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 2,516 | 2,516 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,720 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Masonry Abutment | linear ft. | 104 | 104 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Enclosed/Concealed Bearing | each | 24 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 109 | 109 | 0 | 0 | 0 |