HWY LONGMDOW EXT over WATER TAUNTON RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+41.90327, -71.07571
41°54'12" N, 71°04'33" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	HWY LONGMDOW EXT over WATER TAUNTON RIVER
Structure number:	T010603M2MUNNBI
Old structure number:	TWN641022100 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	.1 MI. S. OF RT. 44
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:	Collector (Urban) `[17]`
Length of largest span:	86.9 ft. `[26.5 m]`
Total length:	180.1 ft. `[54.9 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	44.0 ft. `[13.4 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	58.7 ft. `[17.9 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	13.1 ft. `[4.0 m]`
Skew angle:	18°
Owner:	City or Municipal Highway Agency `[04]`
Year built:	1975
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 18 / H 20 `[4]`
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Steel continuous `[4]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	21,336 `[as of 2018]`
Truck traffic:	5% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. `[4]`
Sufficiency rating:	78.3
Recommended work:	Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement `[33]`
Estimated cost of work:	$2,138,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
October 2018	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	21336	78.3
October 2016	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	26500	78.4
October 2014	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	26500	78.4
October 2012	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	26500	78.4
October 2010	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	22000	79.2
October 2008	Good	Good	Good	Good	40500	76.0
October 2006	Good	Good	Good	Good	22000	79.2
October 2004	Good	Good	Good	Good	13200	80.7
October 2002	Good	Good	Good	Good	20000	80.5
October 2000	Good	Good	Good	Good	20000	77.4
October 1998	Good	Good	Good	Good	17300	77.9
March 1995	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	14250	70.3
March 1993	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	2500	80.5
March 1991	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	1600	80.7

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	1,408	1,308	74	26	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	13,855	0	7,383	4,970	1,502
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	10,340	10,136	202	2	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	7,744	6,916	820	8	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall	linear ft.	77	77	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	124	124	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	62	62	0	0	0
Joints
Compression Joint	linear ft.	118	0	18	8	92
Bearings
Movable Bearing	each	16	0	9	7	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	40	0	0	10	30
Fixed Bearing	each	8	6	2	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	20	0	14	6	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	395	392	3	0	0