Share:

FLOWER AVENUE over SLIGO CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+38.98116, -76.99447
38°58'52" N, 76°59'40" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FLOWER AVENUE over SLIGO CREEK
Structure number:200000M-T-02010
Location:0.28 MI SE OF MONT CO
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Total length:35.8 ft. [10.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:2.3 ft. [0.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.7 ft. [11.2 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:2,750 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Sufficiency rating:40.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$147,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2017FairGoodFairSatisfactory275040.8
August 2016FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory258048.1
August 2015FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory258048.1
August 2014GoodGoodGoodGood258049.1
August 2013GoodGoodGoodGood258037.4
August 2012GoodGoodGoodGood258037.1
August 2011GoodGoodGoodGood258036.1
August 2010GoodGoodGoodGood210036.3
September 2009FairSatisfactoryFairFair210025.6
August 2008FairSatisfactoryFairFair210025.6
August 2007FairSatisfactoryFairFair210025.6
August 2005FairSatisfactoryFairFair210025.6
November 2003FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair210025.6
January 2002FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair81928.6
February 1999FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair81928.6