ERDMAN AVE EB over I-895


+39.30000, -76.54833
39°17'60" N, 76°32'54" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:ERDMAN AVE EB over I-895
Structure number:300000BCY133013
Location:MILEPOST M13.3
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Total length:181.1 ft. [55.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Toll Authority [31]
Year built:1957
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:11,790 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:76.8 tons [69.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:45.9 tons [41.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:75.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,417,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
January 201675.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO11790
January 201474.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO11790
May 201271.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO40950
April 201071.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO40950
March 200971.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO40950
May 200873.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO40950
March 200773.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO40950
February 200673.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO40950
February 200573.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO40950
March 200473.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO40950
March 200373.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO40950
April 200273.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO40950
April 200175.4FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO28574
April 200075.4FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO28574
March 199875.4FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO28574
March 199673.4FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO28574
February 199474.2GoodGoodGoodGoodFO28574
January 199274.2GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO28574