ROUTE 126 over SHEEPSCOT RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+44.22278, -69.5936744°13'22" N, 69°35'37" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | ROUTE 126 over SHEEPSCOT RIVER |
Structure number: | 2650 |
Location: | 2 MI W TOWNLINE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 66.9 ft. [20.4 m] |
Total length: | 74.2 ft. [22.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.6 ft. [7.8 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1935 |
Year reconstructed: | 2010 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,241 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 12.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2241 | 12.0 |
July 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2197 | 12.0 |
July 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2193 | 19.4 |
April 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2195 | 19.4 |
December 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2182 | 59.7 |
April 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2240 | 59.7 |
June 2009 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 2339 | 40.2 |
August 2008 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 2420 | 40.1 |
November 2006 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 1991 | 40.7 |
December 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1958 | 44.1 |
September 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2143 | 43.8 |
November 2000 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 2025 | 41.8 |
December 1998 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 1964 | 41.9 |
May 1996 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1600 | 44.6 |
August 1994 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1609 | 44.5 |
December 1992 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1533 | 44.6 |
July 1990 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1560 | 50.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 51 | 0 | 49 | 2 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 148 | 53 | 70 | 25 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 1,887 | 0 | 1,637 | 250 | 0 |