RTES 100 & 201 over RIGGS BROOK
Map
Coordinates:
+44.33798, -69.7573144°20'17" N, 69°45'26" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RTES 100 & 201 over RIGGS BROOK |
Structure number: | 2719 |
Location: | 3.2 MI SO TOWNLINE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Total length: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2010 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 9,253 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Culvert condition: | No deficiencies [9] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 94.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 9253 | 94.4 |
December 2015 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 8688 | 98.8 |
December 2014 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 8707 | 98.8 |
November 2013 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 8672 | 98.8 |
August 2011 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 8760 | 98.8 |
February 2011 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 11048 | 91.1 |
November 2009 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 10917 | 44.9 |
January 2009 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 10282 | 45.1 |
February 2008 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 10282 | 45.1 |
January 2007 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 10470 | 45.1 |
January 2006 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 9485 | 45.4 |
February 2005 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 9856 | 36.5 |
February 2004 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 9886 | 36.5 |
February 2003 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 9570 | 36.6 |
January 2002 | Poor | 3 out of 10 | 9447 | 36.7 |
October 2000 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 9335 | 48.7 |
January 2000 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 9090 | 48.8 |
January 1999 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 9845 | 48.6 |
October 1997 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 9111 | 48.8 |
November 1996 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 8968 | 48.9 |
November 1995 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 8906 | 61.6 |
December 1994 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 8680 | 61.6 |
February 1994 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 9932 | 61.3 |
December 1992 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 9690 | 61.4 |
December 1990 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 10146 | 70.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 36 | 34 | 2 | 0 | 0 |