ROUTE US 1 over M C RR
Map
Coordinates:
+43.85299, -70.1088343°51'11" N, 70°06'32" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | ROUTE US 1 over M C RR |
Structure number: | 3172 |
Location: | 0.9 MI N OF JCT DESERT RD |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad |
Route classification: | Collector (Urban) [17] |
Length of largest span: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
Total length: | 46.9 ft. [14.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 32.5 ft. [9.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 42° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1936 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 12,879 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 14.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 12879 | 14.2 |
October 2016 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 13443 | 52.4 |
June 2015 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 12926 | 51.0 |
April 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 12660 | 71.1 |
September 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 12800 | 71.1 |
April 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 12800 | 71.1 |
June 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 12942 | 71.0 |
January 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 16382 | 69.7 |
October 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 17060 | 55.8 |
December 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 16560 | 56.1 |
November 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 16448 | 66.2 |
June 2001 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 16220 | 65.3 |
February 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 16478 | 66.3 |
June 1997 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 16624 | 65.1 |
September 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 16171 | 81.0 |
September 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 15560 | 81.1 |
February 1992 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 12970 | 84.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 112 | 75 | 25 | 12 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 94 | 76 | 4 | 14 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 1,880 | 0 | 900 | 980 | 0 |