ROUTE 232 over ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+44.50096, -70.6734044°30'03" N, 70°40'24" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | ROUTE 232 over ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER |
Structure number: | 3248 |
Location: | .1 MI SO US 2 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 191.9 ft. [58.5 m] |
Total length: | 504.9 ft. [153.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 35.4 ft. [10.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 20° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2015 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,517 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 94.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1517 | 94.5 |
January 2016 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 1470 | 97.5 |
October 2014 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 1220 | 50.3 |
November 2013 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 1488 | 49.8 |
October 2011 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 1470 | 49.8 |
August 2010 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 1553 | 49.7 |
November 2009 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 1535 | 49.7 |
March 2008 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 1563 | 49.6 |
January 2006 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 2506 | 45.7 |
September 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2461 | 47.7 |
September 2001 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 2172 | 48.2 |
November 1999 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 2140 | 60.0 |
August 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 1526 | 64.1 |
September 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 1483 | 63.7 |
August 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 1553 | 63.5 |
May 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 1520 | 57.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 2,525 | 2,525 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 17,842 | 16,141 | 1,700 | 1 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 80 | 76 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 82 | 78 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 80 | 76 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 71 | 66 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 1,010 | 1,010 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,010 | 1,010 | 0 | 0 | 0 |