WINSLOW MILLS RD over MEDOMAK RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+44.12063, -69.4089844°07'14" N, 69°24'32" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | WINSLOW MILLS RD over MEDOMAK RIVER |
Structure number: | 5078 |
Location: | 0.1 MI E JCT RTE 32 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 83.0 ft. [25.3 m] |
Total length: | 85.0 ft. [25.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1922 |
Year reconstructed: | 2018 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 330 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 89.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 330 | 89.9 |
September 2016 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 294 | 41.9 |
October 2014 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 286 | 42.2 |
April 2013 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 275 | 42.2 |
October 2012 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 275 | 50.9 |
August 2011 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 273 | 50.9 |
November 2010 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 280 | 50.9 |
September 2009 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 270 | 50.9 |
June 2007 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 280 | 50.9 |
February 2006 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Satisfactory | 270 | 33.7 |
June 2003 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Satisfactory | 270 | 33.7 |
June 2001 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Poor | 328 | 33.7 |
November 1999 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Poor | 317 | 33.7 |
June 1997 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Fair | 380 | 33.6 |
June 1995 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Fair | 371 | 33.6 |
May 1993 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Fair | 358 | 47.8 |
May 1991 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Fair | 356 | 49.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 332 | 332 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 2,241 | 2,241 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 166 | 166 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 166 | 166 | 0 | 0 | 0 |