Share:

SULLIVAN CRK TRAIL over BLACK CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+46.26854, -84.71790
46°16'07" N, 84°43'04" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SULLIVAN CRK TRAIL over BLACK CREEK
Structure number:000000000001663
Old structure number:17311A00011B010 (from 1992 edition)
Location:8 MI NW OF RUDYARD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Total length:53.8 ft. [16.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1950
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:40 [as of 1986]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:49.3
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$90,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
June 2017FairVery GoodSatisfactoryFair4049.3
June 2015FairVery GoodSatisfactoryFair4049.3
June 2013FairVery GoodSatisfactoryFair4049.3
June 2011FairVery GoodSatisfactoryFair4048.5
August 2009FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory4056.4
May 2007FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory4075.9
June 2005FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory4075.9
June 2003GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood4075.9
June 2001GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood4080.4
June 1999GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood4080.4
June 1997GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good4080.4
June 1995GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good4090.3
June 1993GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good4090.3
June 1991GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good4090.3