STEPHAN BRIDGE RD over AU SABLE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+44.67963, -84.5772044°40'47" N, 84°34'38" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | STEPHAN BRIDGE RD over AU SABLE RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000002067 |
Old structure number: | 20200016000B010 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 7.0 MI NE OF GRAYLING |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 56.8 ft. [17.3 m] |
Total length: | 61.0 ft. [18.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.2 ft. [8.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.5 ft. [9.0 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year reconstructed: | 1960 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 560 [as of 2013] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 48.4 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $33,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2018 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 560 | 48.4 |
November 2016 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 560 | 48.4 |
November 2014 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 560 | 48.4 |
November 2012 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 310 | 49.8 |
November 2010 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 310 | 49.8 |
November 2008 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 310 | 49.8 |
August 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 310 | 59.8 |
January 2004 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 310 | 59.8 |
January 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 310 | 59.8 |
January 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 310 | 59.8 |
October 1997 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 310 | 64.9 |
April 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 310 | 73.6 |
May 1993 | Poor | Very Good | Serious | Good | 310 | 40.3 |
January 1990 | Poor | Very Good | Serious | Good | 310 | 40.3 |