Share:

MAY LAKE ROAD over AU SABLE RIVER

Crawford County, Michigan

Map

Coordinates:
+44.77128, -84.76396
44°46'17" N, 84°45'50" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	MAY LAKE ROAD over AU SABLE RIVER
Structure number:	000000000002074
Old structure number:	20302B00001B010 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	1 MI S OF FREDERIC
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	30.8 ft. `[9.4 m]`
Total length:	34.8 ft. `[10.6 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	29.5 ft. `[9.0 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	31.8 ft. `[9.7 m]`
Skew angle:	10°
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	1995
Historic significance:	Historical significance is not determinable at this time `[4]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Wood or timber `[7]`
Main span design:	Slab `[01]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Latest Available Inspection: November 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Good
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	200 `[as of 1995]`
Deck condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	100.0

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
November 2018	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	100.0
November 2016	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	100.0
November 2014	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	100.0
November 2012	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	100.0
November 2010	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	100.0
November 2008	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	100.0
July 2006	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	100.0
January 2004	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	100.0
January 2002	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	100.0
January 2000	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	100.0
September 1997	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	100.0
April 1995	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	54.7
April 1993	Poor	Poor	Serious	Good	100	25.4
November 1990	Poor	Fair	Serious	Good	100	27.4

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1249166