OKEMOS ROAD SB over RED CEDAR RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+42.71317, -84.43099
42°42'47" N, 84°25'52" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	OKEMOS ROAD SB over RED CEDAR RIVER
Structure number:	000000000003879
Old structure number:	33200082000B020 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	0.1 MI N OF S LMTS OF OKE
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:	Minor Arterial (Urban) `[16]`
Length of largest span:	69.9 ft. `[21.3 m]`
Total length:	179.8 ft. `[54.8 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	24.0 ft. `[7.3 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	31.8 ft. `[9.7 m]`
Skew angle:	45°
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	1959
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Steel `[3]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) `[1]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	16,400 `[as of 2004]`
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	30.8
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$351,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
July 2018	Poor	Fair	Poor	Satisfactory	16400	30.8
July 2017	Poor	Fair	Poor	Satisfactory	16400	30.8
July 2016	Poor	Fair	Poor	Satisfactory	16400	30.8
January 2016	Poor	Fair	Critical	Satisfactory	16400	6.0
July 2013	Poor	Fair	Poor	Satisfactory	16400	47.8
July 2011	Poor	Fair	Poor	Satisfactory	16400	47.8
July 2009	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	16400	62.4
June 2007	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	16400	62.4
June 2005	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	14500	75.2
June 2003	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	14500	74.3
June 2001	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	14500	74.3
June 1999	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	14500	74.3
August 1997	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	14500	74.3
August 1995	Good	Good	Good	Good	14500	75.2
September 1993	Good	Good	Good	Good	10492	76.0
April 1991	Good	Good	Good	Good	10492	76.0

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	1,080	400	200	480	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	9,720	3,400	3,000	3,200	120
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	5,721	3,383	2,288	50	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	4,315	3,244	1,050	21	0
Superstructure
Steel Pin or Pin & Hangar Assembly	each	12	6	0	6	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall	linear ft.	64	54	10	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	84	58	24	2	0
Joints
Strip Seal Joint	linear ft.	64	64	0	0	0
Assembly without Seal Joint	linear ft.	64	0	64	0	0
Bearings
Movable Bearing	each	12	0	12	0	0
Fixed Bearing	each	12	0	12	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	360	0	320	40	0