ROLLAND ROAD over CHIPPEWA RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+43.65718, -85.0254143°39'26" N, 85°01'31" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | ROLLAND ROAD over CHIPPEWA RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000004296 |
Old structure number: | 37200033000B250 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | SEC 27-28 SHERMAN TWP |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
Total length: | 53.8 ft. [16.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1940 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 284 [as of 2012] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 23.9 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $320,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Satisfactory | 284 | 23.9 |
April 2017 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Satisfactory | 284 | 23.9 |
April 2016 | Poor | Serious | Serious | Satisfactory | 284 | 23.9 |
April 2015 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Satisfactory | 284 | 38.6 |
April 2013 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Satisfactory | 284 | 38.6 |
April 2012 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Satisfactory | 284 | 38.6 |
May 2011 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Satisfactory | 130 | 45.2 |
May 2009 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Satisfactory | 130 | 45.2 |
May 2008 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Satisfactory | 130 | 45.2 |
May 2006 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 130 | 47.2 |
June 2004 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 130 | 48.2 |
July 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 130 | 66.3 |
May 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 117 | 63.3 |
July 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 117 | 64.5 |
July 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 66.5 |
June 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 72.2 |
June 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 72.2 |
April 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 100 | 72.2 |