COUNTY ROAD 501 over LITTLE TWO HEARTED RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+46.65162, -85.3733346°39'06" N, 85°22'24" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY ROAD 501 over LITTLE TWO HEARTED RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000005913 |
Old structure number: | 48200007000B010 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 2 MI. E. PIKE LAKE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Total length: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1913 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 10 [as of 2016] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 28.7 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Good | 10 | 28.7 |
October 2017 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Good | 10 | 28.7 |
October 2016 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Good | 10 | 29.7 |
October 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Good | 10 | 29.7 |
October 2014 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Good | 10 | 29.7 |
October 2013 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Good | 10 | 29.7 |
October 2012 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Good | 50 | 29.7 |
October 2011 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Good | 50 | 45.1 |
December 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 63.1 |
October 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 63.1 |
October 2007 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 50 | 63.1 |
November 2006 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 50 | 63.1 |
October 2005 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 50 | 64.3 |
October 2004 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 50 | 64.3 |
January 2004 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 50 | 64.3 |
November 2002 | Good | Excellent | Good | Good | 50 | 64.3 |
October 2001 | Good | Excellent | Good | Good | 50 | 47.2 |
September 2000 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 47.2 |
November 1999 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 47.2 |
December 1998 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 47.2 |
August 1996 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 47.2 |
September 1994 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 50 | 48.8 |
July 1992 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 45.9 |
January 1990 | Poor | Good | Serious | Good | 100 | 28.8 |