M-102 RAMP over M-10 RAMP
Map
Coordinates:
+42.44508, -83.2034242°26'42" N, 83°12'12" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | M-102 RAMP over M-10 RAMP |
Structure number: | 000000000011464 |
Old structure number: | 82182112000S340 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | N LTS OF DETROIT |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 56.8 ft. [17.3 m] |
Total length: | 59.1 ft. [18.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 62° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Year reconstructed: | 2010 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 6,000 [as of 2009] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 91.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 6000 | 91.0 |
February 2017 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 6000 | 91.0 |
February 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 6000 | 91.0 |
March 2013 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 6000 | 91.0 |
March 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6000 | 91.0 |
March 2009 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 9800 | 77.8 |
April 2006 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 9800 | 77.8 |
April 2004 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 9800 | 79.8 |
April 2002 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 9800 | 79.8 |
April 2000 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 9800 | 79.8 |
August 1998 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 9800 | 77.8 |
July 1996 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 9800 | 79.8 |
August 1994 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 9800 | 81.4 |
October 1992 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 9800 | 78.4 |
October 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 9800 | 82.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 295 | 295 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 2,535 | 2,535 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,384 | 1,384 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 89 | 86 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 89 | 45 | 44 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 118 | 113 | 5 | 0 | 0 |