I96WB TO I94WB RMP over I-96 & RAMP


+42.35030, -83.09908
42°21'01" N, 83°05'57" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:I96WB TO I94WB RMP over I-96 & RAMP
Structure number:000000000011590
Old structure number:82182123000S420 (from 1992 edition)
Purpose:Carries highway overpass (third level) over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:110.9 ft. [33.8 m]
Total length:756.9 ft. [230.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.7 ft. [11.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1971
Year reconstructed:2005
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:10
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,290 [as of 1982]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:71.6 tons [65.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.8 tons [38.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:94.0
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$455,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
October 201594.0GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6290
October 201394.0GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6290
October 201194.0GoodGoodGoodGood-6290
October 200994.0GoodGoodGoodGood-6290
August 200793.0GoodExcellentGoodGood-6290
August 200593.0GoodExcellentGoodGood-6290
November 200432.0PoorPoorSatisfactoryCritical-6290
June 200334.0PoorPoorSatisfactoryCriticalSD6290
September 200234.0PoorPoorSatisfactoryCriticalSD6290
December 200134.0PoorPoorSatisfactoryCriticalSD6290
August 200037.0PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryCriticalSD6290
July 199979.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO6290
November 199835.0PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryCriticalSD6290
September 199735.0PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryCriticalSD6290
June 199581.0FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO6290
October 199381.0FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO6290
June 199182.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFairFO6290