CSAH 30 over OTTER TAIL RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+46.72526, -95.69734
46°43'31" N, 95°41'50" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	CSAH 30 over OTTER TAIL RIVER
Structure number:	03505
Location:	0.2 MI SE OF JCT TH 87
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	87.9 ft. `[26.8 m]`
Total length:	90.9 ft. `[27.7 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	44.0 ft. `[13.4 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	54.5 ft. `[16.6 m]`
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	1978
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Prestressed concrete `[5]`
Main span design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) `[1]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	1,200 `[as of 2016]`
Deck condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Superior to present desirable criteria `[9]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	94.9

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
September 2018	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	1200	94.9
September 2017	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	2000	94.8
September 2016	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	2000	94.8
September 2015	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	2000	94.8
September 2014	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	2000	94.8
September 2013	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	2000	94.8
October 2011	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	2000	96.8
September 2009	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	2000	96.8
September 2007	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	1300	98.9
October 2006	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	1300	98.9
November 2005	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	1300	98.9
October 2004	Fair	Fair	Good	Good	1300	98.9
February 2004	Fair	Fair	Good	Good	1000	98.9
December 2002	Fair	Fair	Good	Good	1000	98.9
November 2001	Fair	Fair	Good	Good	1000	98.9
January 2001	Fair	Fair	Very Good	Very Good	1000	97.9
November 1999	Fair	Fair	Very Good	Very Good	1000	97.9
December 1998	Fair	Fair	Very Good	Very Good	1000	97.9
December 1997	Fair	Fair	Very Good	Very Good	1000	97.0
November 1996	Fair	Fair	Very Good	Very Good	1000	97.0
December 1995	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	700	97.9
February 1995	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	700	97.9
December 1993	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	700	97.9
December 1992	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	920	97.9
April 1992	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	920	97.9

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	893	882	11	0	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	4,949	0	4,851	98	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	3,993	2,795	0	1,198	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	165	0	165	0	0
Joints
Open Joint	linear ft.	108	0	0	108	0
Bearings
Fixed Bearing	each	20	20	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	112	112	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	457	457	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	226	0	226	0	0