CSAH 15 over I 94
Map
Coordinates:
+45.96887, -95.6449545°58'08" N, 95°38'42" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CSAH 15 over I 94 |
Structure number: | 21809 |
Location: | 5.0 MI SE OF JCT TH 79 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 72.8 ft. [22.2 m] |
Total length: | 233.3 ft. [71.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.8 ft. [10.3 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 24° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1966 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 55 [as of 2010] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 81.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 55 | 81.9 |
August 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 82.9 |
August 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 82.9 |
August 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 83.9 |
September 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 83.7 |
September 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 91.8 |
September 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 93.8 |
October 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 75 | 93.8 |
October 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 75 | 93.8 |
October 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 95 | 93.7 |
October 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 95 | 93.6 |
October 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 95 | 93.6 |
October 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 95 | 93.6 |
October 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 95 | 93.2 |
October 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 95 | 86.4 |
May 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 70 | 86.5 |
April 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 70 | 86.5 |
October 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 70 | 87.5 |
September 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 70 | 87.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 932 | 461 | 471 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 9,310 | 0 | 9,140 | 150 | 20 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 7,866 | 7,846 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 6,534 | 6,444 | 90 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 114 | 109 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 99 | 94 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 92 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 92 | 88 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 466 | 466 | 0 | 0 | 0 |