I 94 EB over CSAH 23
Map
Coordinates:
+45.83561, -95.3361945°50'08" N, 95°20'10" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | I 94 EB over CSAH 23 |
Structure number: | 21818 |
Location: | 2.5 MI E OF JCT TH 29 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Length of largest span: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
Total length: | 110.9 ft. [33.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 38.4 ft. [11.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 41.3 ft. [12.6 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Low slump Concrete [4] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 9,700 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 19% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 83.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 9700 | 83.8 |
September 2016 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 7500 | 85.8 |
September 2014 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 7500 | 85.8 |
September 2012 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 7500 | 85.8 |
September 2010 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 7500 | 85.8 |
September 2008 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 7500 | 86.0 |
September 2007 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 7500 | 86.0 |
October 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 7500 | 86.0 |
October 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 7550 | 85.9 |
October 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6300 | 87.7 |
October 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 6300 | 87.7 |
October 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 6800 | 87.0 |
October 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 6300 | 87.7 |
September 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 6000 | 88.5 |
April 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 6000 | 88.3 |
April 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 6050 | 88.3 |
April 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 6050 | 88.3 |
October 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 5100 | 89.6 |
September 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 5100 | 89.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 550 | 498 | 46 | 6 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 4,000 | 0 | 2,800 | 800 | 400 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 4,565 | 4,523 | 12 | 30 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 4,263 | 4,048 | 215 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 116 | 113 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 76 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 82 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 266 | 214 | 0 | 52 | 0 |
Bearings |
Fixed Bearing | each | 20 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 220 | 197 | 0 | 23 | 0 |