I 94 WB over CSAH 1
Map
Coordinates:
+45.98581, -95.6969345°59'09" N, 95°41'49" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | I 94 WB over CSAH 1 |
Structure number: | 21823 |
Location: | 2.0 MI SE OF JCT TH 79 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Length of largest span: | 42.7 ft. [13.0 m] |
Total length: | 127.6 ft. [38.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.7 ft. [13.0 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 3° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Low slump Concrete [4] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 8,500 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 19% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 91.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 8500 | 91.4 |
October 2016 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7250 | 92.2 |
October 2014 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 7250 | 92.2 |
October 2012 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 7250 | 92.2 |
September 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 7250 | 79.4 |
October 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 7250 | 79.4 |
September 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 7250 | 80.5 |
October 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 7250 | 80.5 |
October 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 6300 | 81.2 |
October 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 4350 | 82.7 |
October 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 4350 | 82.7 |
October 1999 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4850 | 93.8 |
October 1998 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4350 | 94.1 |
September 1996 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 5300 | 93.5 |
October 1995 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 5300 | 93.4 |
May 1994 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4850 | 93.7 |
April 1993 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4850 | 93.7 |
October 1992 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 3725 | 94.5 |
October 1991 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 3725 | 94.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 640 | 640 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 5,300 | 5,300 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 5,432 | 5,422 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 5,005 | 4,955 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 112 | 0 | 56 | 56 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 85 | 80 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 160 | 80 | 0 | 80 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 20 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 256 | 229 | 27 | 0 | 0 |