I 94 E Frontage Rd over Lyndale Avenue NB


+44.97203, -93.28737
44°58'19" N, 93°17'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:I 94 E Frontage Rd over Lyndale Avenue NB
Structure number:27799L
Location:0.1 MI S OF JCT TH 394
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Total length:508.6 ft. [155.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1968
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:9
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10,500 [as of 1994]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:71.5 tons [65.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.7 tons [38.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:77.7
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33]
Estimated cost of work:$480,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
July 201577.7GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO10500
September 201377.7FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
September 201177.7FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
September 200977.7FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
July 200877.7FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
May 200777.7FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
April 200677.7FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
July 200477.7FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
July 200377.7FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
July 200277.7FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
June 200277.7FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
March 200177.7FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
October 199977.7FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
September 199877.7FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
August 199779.4FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
October 199679.4FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO10500
October 199576.0GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO10500
October 199491.2GoodGoodVery GoodGood-10500
October 199391.2GoodGoodVery GoodGood-10500
October 199291.2GoodGoodVery GoodGood-10500
July 199191.2GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good-10500