TH 87 over CROW WING RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+46.84657, -94.8751446°50'48" N, 94°52'31" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | TH 87 over CROW WING RIVER |
Structure number: | 29001 |
Location: | 11.7 MI E OF TH 71 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Total length: | 101.1 ft. [30.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 39.4 ft. [12.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2001 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Low slump Concrete [4] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 690 [as of 2008] |
Truck traffic: | 13% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2017 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 690 | 98.9 |
March 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 690 | 98.9 |
April 2013 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 690 | 98.9 |
April 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 690 | 98.9 |
August 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 690 | 98.9 |
August 2007 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 680 | 98.9 |
March 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 680 | 98.9 |
September 2003 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 770 | 98.8 |
September 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 720 | 98.8 |
March 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 720 | 98.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 141 | 121 | 15 | 5 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 72 | 36 | 36 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 202 | 202 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 404 | 0 | 404 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 202 | 196 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 3,973 | 3,959 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 3,638 | 3,583 | 55 | 0 | 0 |