CSAH 13 over CROW WING RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+46.89829, -94.85516
46°53'54" N, 94°51'19" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	CSAH 13 over CROW WING RIVER
Structure number:	29505
Location:	2.0 MI E OF JCT CSAH 17
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Major Collector (Rural) `[07]`
Length of largest span:	19.0 ft. `[5.8 m]`
Total length:	57.7 ft. `[17.6 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	29.5 ft. `[9.0 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	31.8 ft. `[9.7 m]`
Owner:	County Highway Agency `[02]`
Year built:	1966
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 18 / H 20 `[4]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Prestressed concrete `[5]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	720 `[as of 2016]`
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	67.1
Estimated cost of work:	$552,000,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
October 2018	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	720	67.1
October 2017	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	640	67.2
November 2016	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	640	67.2
October 2015	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	640	67.2
October 2014	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	640	67.2
October 2013	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	640	67.2
October 2012	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	640	67.4
November 2011	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	640	67.4
November 2010	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	640	67.4
November 2009	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	640	67.4
October 2008	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	650	67.4
August 2007	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	650	70.4
October 2006	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	650	70.4
September 2005	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	540	70.5
September 2004	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	540	70.5
November 2003	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Fair	480	87.6
November 2002	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	480	93.7
October 2001	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	480	93.7
December 2000	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	480	92.7
November 1999	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	480	92.7
October 1998	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	480	92.7
December 1997	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	250	84.3
November 1996	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	250	84.3
November 1995	Good	Good	Good	Good	250	91.2
December 1994	Good	Good	Good	Good	250	91.2
October 1993	Good	Good	Good	Good	275	91.2
November 1992	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	275	91.2
October 1991	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	275	91.2

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	1,156	0	346	810	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange	sq. ft.	1,832	1,182	200	450	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	1,701	0	1,667	34	0
Substructure
Timber Abutment	linear ft.	102	0	77	25	0
Timber Pile	each	40	0	17	23	0
Timber Pier Cap	linear ft.	131	0	72	59	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	115	0	115	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	445	0	330	115	0