CR 109 over CROW WING RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+46.82321, -94.8722446°49'24" N, 94°52'20" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CR 109 over CROW WING RIVER |
Structure number: | 29519 |
Location: | 1.5 MI SE OF JCT CSAH 13 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 76.1 ft. [23.2 m] |
Total length: | 77.4 ft. [23.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 35.4 ft. [10.8 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1994 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 190 [as of 2016] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 190 | 99.9 |
November 2016 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 170 | 97.9 |
October 2014 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 170 | 97.9 |
October 2012 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 170 | 97.9 |
November 2010 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 170 | 97.9 |
October 2008 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 170 | 97.9 |
October 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 170 | 99.9 |
September 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 120 | 99.9 |
November 2003 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 105 | 99.9 |
November 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 105 | 99.9 |
October 2001 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 105 | 99.9 |
December 2000 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 105 | 98.9 |
November 1999 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 105 | 98.9 |
October 1998 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 105 | 98.9 |
November 1997 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 90 | 97.9 |
November 1996 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 90 | 97.9 |
November 1995 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 90 | 97.9 |
December 1994 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 90 | 97.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 308 | 308 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 2,736 | 2,734 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 2,476 | 2,476 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 112 | 112 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 154 | 154 | 0 | 0 | 0 |