CR 89 over STREAM
Map
Coordinates:
+47.03761, -95.1036947°02'15" N, 95°06'13" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CR 89 over STREAM |
Structure number: | 29520 |
Location: | 0.4 MI N OF JCT TH 71 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 48.9 ft. [14.9 m] |
Total length: | 51.5 ft. [15.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 35.4 ft. [10.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 38.4 ft. [11.7 m] |
Skew angle: | 20° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1999 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 375 [as of 2012] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 375 | 99.9 |
November 2016 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 330 | 97.9 |
October 2014 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Very Good | 330 | 97.9 |
October 2012 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Very Good | 330 | 97.9 |
November 2010 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Very Good | 330 | 97.9 |
November 2008 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 330 | 97.9 |
October 2006 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 330 | 99.9 |
September 2004 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 285 | 99.9 |
November 2003 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 330 | 99.9 |
November 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 330 | 99.9 |
October 2001 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 330 | 99.9 |
January 2001 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 330 | 98.9 |
November 1999 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 330 | 98.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 119 | 119 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 157 | 157 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 1,983 | 1,983 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,819 | 1,819 | 0 | 0 | 0 |