UTWN 201 over CROW CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | UTWN 201 over CROW CREEK |
Structure number: | 39516 |
Location: | ANGLE INLET |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Total length: | 78.1 ft. [23.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1990 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 1986] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 94.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 94.6 |
October 2016 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 94.6 |
November 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Excellent | 50 | 94.6 |
October 2013 | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 94.6 |
November 2011 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 93.7 |
September 2009 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 90.7 |
November 2008 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 90.7 |
August 2006 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 93.7 |
August 2005 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 93.7 |
June 2003 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 93.7 |
October 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 93.7 |
February 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 94.6 |
November 1999 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 92.6 |
November 1997 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 82.3 |
December 1995 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 89.7 |
January 1995 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 89.7 |
November 1993 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 89.7 |
September 1992 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 89.7 |
September 1991 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 89.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Timber Floor Beam | linear ft. | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Timber Abutment | linear ft. | 92 | 82 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pile | each | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 363 | 36 | 0 | 327 | 0 |
Timber Pile | each | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Timber Pier Cap | linear ft. | 64 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Timber Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 153 | 62 | 91 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Timber Slab | sq. ft. | 2,340 | 2,340 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 2,196 | 1,647 | 549 | 0 | 0 |