TH 250 over S BR ROOT RIVER

This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.

Map

Coordinates:
+43.72397, -91.97111
43°43'26" N, 91°58'16" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	TH 250 over S BR ROOT RIVER
Structure number:	6975
Location:	1.0 MI N OF JCT TH 16
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Major Collector (Rural) `[07]`
Length of largest span:	100.1 ft. `[30.5 m]`
Total length:	104.0 ft. `[31.7 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	25.9 ft. `[7.9 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	26.9 ft. `[8.2 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	15.7 ft. `[4.8 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1931
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 13.5 / H 15 `[2]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	787 `[as of 2008]`
Truck traffic:	11% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	57.6
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
May 2015	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Satisfactory	787	57.6
May 2014	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Satisfactory	787	57.6
May 2013	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Satisfactory	787	57.6
May 2012	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	787	57.6
May 2011	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	787	47.0
May 2010	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	787	47.0
June 2009	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	787	57.6
April 2008	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	840	57.4
April 2007	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	840	57.4
June 2006	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	840	57.4
April 2005	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	840	57.4
October 2004	Good	Good	Good	Good	870	57.4
July 2003	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	870	57.4
May 2002	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	940	57.1
June 2001	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	940	51.8
April 2000	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	940	56.9
April 1999	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	940	56.9
April 1998	Fair	Very Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	760	57.5
April 1997	Fair	Very Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	760	52.8
June 1996	Fair	Very Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	720	60.0
August 1995	Fair	Very Good	Satisfactory	Good	720	62.2
May 1994	Poor	Fair	Poor	Satisfactory	670	41.8
April 1993	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	670	42.9
July 1992	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	580	43.3
October 1991	Poor	Good	Poor	Satisfactory	580	43.3