TH 250 over S BR ROOT RIVER
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+43.72397, -91.9711143°43'26" N, 91°58'16" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | TH 250 over S BR ROOT RIVER |
Structure number: | 6975 |
Location: | 1.0 MI N OF JCT TH 16 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 100.1 ft. [30.5 m] |
Total length: | 104.0 ft. [31.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1931 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2015
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 787 [as of 2008] |
Truck traffic: | 11% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 57.6 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 787 | 57.6 |
May 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 787 | 57.6 |
May 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 787 | 57.6 |
May 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 787 | 57.6 |
May 2011 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 787 | 47.0 |
May 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 787 | 47.0 |
June 2009 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 787 | 57.6 |
April 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 840 | 57.4 |
April 2007 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 840 | 57.4 |
June 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 840 | 57.4 |
April 2005 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 840 | 57.4 |
October 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 870 | 57.4 |
July 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 870 | 57.4 |
May 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 940 | 57.1 |
June 2001 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 940 | 51.8 |
April 2000 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 940 | 56.9 |
April 1999 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 940 | 56.9 |
April 1998 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 760 | 57.5 |
April 1997 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 760 | 52.8 |
June 1996 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 720 | 60.0 |
August 1995 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 720 | 62.2 |
May 1994 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 670 | 41.8 |
April 1993 | Poor | Good | Poor | Satisfactory | 670 | 42.9 |
July 1992 | Poor | Good | Poor | Satisfactory | 580 | 43.3 |
October 1991 | Poor | Good | Poor | Satisfactory | 580 | 43.3 |