+45.52270, -94.04861
45°31'22" N, 94°02'55" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CSAH 3 over ELK RIVER
Structure number:71503
Location:0.9 MI E OF JCT CR65
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:57.7 ft. [17.6 m]
Total length:153.2 ft. [46.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Skew angle:35°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:1,512 [as of 2008]
Deck condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:41.4 tons [37.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.3 tons [21.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:64.4

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
October 201664.4PoorSeriousSatisfactoryGoodSD1512
October 201564.4PoorSeriousSatisfactoryGoodSD1512
October 201464.4PoorSeriousSatisfactoryGoodSD1512
October 201364.4PoorSeriousSatisfactoryGoodSD1512
October 201264.4PoorSeriousSatisfactoryGoodSD1512
September 201164.4PoorSeriousGoodGoodSD1512
November 201064.4PoorSeriousGoodGoodSD1512
August 200964.4PoorSeriousGoodGoodSD1512
October 200864.3PoorSeriousGoodGoodSD1600
September 200768.0PoorSeriousGoodGoodSD1600
October 200670.0PoorPoorGoodGoodSD1600
November 200570.0PoorPoorGoodGoodSD1600
October 200372.3FairFairGoodSatisfactory-1250
August 200185.9FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory-1250
April 199972.9FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory-1250
March 199972.9FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory-1250
September 199672.8GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good-1250
May 199680.6GoodGoodVery GoodGood-1250
November 199488.3GoodGoodVery GoodGood-590
November 199388.3GoodGoodVery GoodGood-590
October 199288.3GoodGoodVery GoodGood-590
August 199188.3GoodGoodVery GoodGood-525