Portland Ave over TH 62


+44.89064, -93.26783
44°53'26" N, 93°16'04" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:Portland Ave over TH 62
Structure number:7269
Location:0.4 MI E OF E JCT TH 35W
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:74.2 ft. [22.6 m]
Total length:152.2 ft. [46.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:52.2 ft. [15.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:64.3 ft. [19.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16,300 [as of 2005]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:62.9 tons [57.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.5 tons [34.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:79.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,107,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
August 201579.0FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO16300
August 201379.0FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO16300
August 201178.0FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO16300
August 201079.0FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-16300
October 200879.0FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-16300
August 200779.0FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-16300
June 200679.0FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-16300
July 200580.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-18400
December 200480.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-18400
July 200380.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-15900
December 200178.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO15900
December 200078.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO15900
November 199978.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO15900
May 199878.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO15900
October 199675.5FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO13200
October 199575.4FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO13200
October 199474.7FairSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactoryFO16500
May 199374.7FairSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactoryFO16500
August 199270.6FairGoodVery GoodSatisfactoryFO15500
July 199170.6FairGoodVery GoodSatisfactoryFO15500