TWO RD. over JUD DITCH # 53


+47.44032, -96.70833
47°26'25" N, 96°42'30" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:TWO RD. over JUD DITCH # 53
Structure number:93491
Location:0.9 MI N OF JCT CSAH 11
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:11.5 ft. [3.5 m]
Total length:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Owner:Town or Township Highway Agency [03]
Year built:1980
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Gravel [8]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10 [as of 1996]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:59.3 tons [53.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:39.5 tons [35.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:100.0

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
September 2015100.0Good8 out of 10-10
October 2013100.0Good8 out of 10-10
September 201299.0Good8 out of 10-10
September 201199.0Good8 out of 10-10
December 201099.0Good8 out of 10-10
September 200999.0Good8 out of 10-10
December 200899.0Good8 out of 10-10
November 200699.0Good8 out of 10-10
October 200599.0Good8 out of 10-10
October 200399.0Good8 out of 10-10
August 200299.0Good8 out of 10-10
January 200199.0---10
October 199999.0Good8 out of 10-10
October 199899.0Good8 out of 10-10
May 1997100.0Good8 out of 10-10
November 1995100.0Good8 out of 10-30
November 1994100.0Good8 out of 10-30
September 1993100.0Good8 out of 10-30
September 1992100.0Good8 out of 10-30
September 1991100.0Good8 out of 10-30