Share: 
CSAH 5 over BAUDETTE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+48.64572, -94.62672
48°38'45" N, 94°37'36" W
+48.64572, -94.62672
48°38'45" N, 94°37'36" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | CSAH 5 over BAUDETTE RIVER |
| Structure number: | 97921 |
| Location: | 1.7 MI S OF JCT CSAH 1 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
| Total length: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1994 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 135 [as of 2008] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 99.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2017 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 135 | 99.9 |
| November 2015 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 135 | 99.9 |
| October 2013 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 135 | 99.9 |
| October 2011 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 135 | 99.9 |
| September 2009 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 135 | 97.9 |
| December 2007 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 110 | 99.9 |
| December 2005 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 110 | 99.9 |
| February 2004 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 110 | 99.9 |
| November 2002 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 135 | 99.9 |
| December 2001 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 135 | 99.9 |
| September 2000 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 135 | 98.9 |
| November 1999 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 135 | 98.9 |
| September 1998 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 100 | 98.9 |
| October 1997 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 100 | 99.9 |
| January 1997 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 100 | 99.9 |
| December 1995 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 100 | 99.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 121 | 118 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1270923
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1270923