TWP 495 over CP RAIL
Map
Coordinates:
+45.80345, -95.7493345°48'12" N, 95°44'58" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | TWP 495 over CP RAIL |
Structure number: | L0193 |
Location: | AT JCT TH 55 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over railroad |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 26.6 ft. [8.1 m] |
Total length: | 133.5 ft. [40.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.3 ft. [7.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.6 ft. [7.8 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 25° |
Owner: | Railroad [27] |
Year built: | 1962 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Open Grating [3] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 1986] |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 86.0 |
Estimated cost of work: | $295,000,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 86.0 |
September 2017 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 86.0 |
September 2016 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 86.0 |
September 2015 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 86.0 |
September 2014 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 86.0 |
November 2013 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 86.0 |
October 2011 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 85.0 |
October 2009 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 50 | 87.0 |
September 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 50 | 89.0 |
November 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 50 | 89.0 |
October 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 50 | 89.0 |
October 2001 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 50 | 93.0 |
October 1999 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 50 | 87.0 |
October 1997 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 50 | 83.1 |
January 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 50 | 86.0 |
December 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 50 | 86.0 |
February 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 50 | 86.0 |
February 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 50 | 86.0 |
January 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 86.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Timber Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 2,024 | 1,761 | 263 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Timber Abutment | linear ft. | 52 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
Timber Pile | each | 30 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Timber Pier Cap | linear ft. | 157 | 157 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Corrugated or Orthotropic Deck | sq. ft. | 3,428 | 3,085 | 0 | 343 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 3,251 | 0 | 0 | 3,251 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Timber Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 266 | 205 | 61 | 0 | 0 |