+44.79093, -92.97981
44°47'27" N, 92°58'47" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:L8159
Location:1.2 MI SE OF JCT CR75
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:75.1 ft. [22.9 m]
Total length:127.6 ft. [38.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1933
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:412 [as of 1978]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:50.3 tons [45.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:30.1 tons [27.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:51.0
Estimated cost of work:$365,000,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
September 201651.0PoorGoodPoorSatisfactorySD412
September 201551.0PoorGoodPoorSatisfactorySD412
October 201451.0PoorGoodPoorSatisfactorySD412
October 201339.7PoorVery GoodSeriousSatisfactorySD412
November 201239.7PoorVery GoodSeriousSatisfactorySD412
November 201176.1FairVery GoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO412
March 201078.1FairVery GoodSatisfactoryGoodFO412
December 200878.1GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO412
January 200881.8GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO412
January 200781.8GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO412
January 200682.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO412
December 200481.8GoodExcellentVery GoodGoodFO412
January 200481.8GoodExcellentVery GoodGoodFO412
January 200381.8GoodExcellentVery GoodGoodFO412
November 200181.8GoodExcellentVery GoodGoodFO412
March 200081.8-----412
April 199971.7GoodExcellentVery GoodGood-412
March 199771.8GoodExcellentVery GoodGood-412
January 199671.7GoodExcellentVery GoodGood-412
February 199571.7GoodExcellentVery GoodGood-412
February 199471.7GoodExcellentVery GoodGood-412
February 199371.7GoodExcellentVery GoodGood-412
January 19929.1PoorSeriousPoorSatisfactorySD412