Share: 
TWP 180 over POPLAR RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+47.80360, -96.05840
47°48'13" N, 96°03'30" W
+47.80360, -96.05840
47°48'13" N, 96°03'30" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | TWP 180 over POPLAR RIVER |
| Structure number: | L9965 |
| Location: | 0.7 MI E OF JCT CSAH 15 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 12.8 ft. [3.9 m] |
| Total length: | 34.8 ft. [10.6 m] |
| Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
| Year built: | 1980 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2016
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 25 [as of 1971] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 99.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2016 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| September 2014 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| November 2012 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| December 2010 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| October 2008 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| December 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| December 2004 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| November 2002 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| December 2000 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| October 1999 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| October 1998 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| October 1996 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
| December 1995 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
| December 1994 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
| October 1993 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
| October 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
| October 1991 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 90 | 87 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1272430
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1272430