Share: 
TWP 55 over HILL RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+47.81834, -95.94519
47°49'06" N, 95°56'43" W
+47.81834, -95.94519
47°49'06" N, 95°56'43" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | TWP 55 over HILL RIVER |
| Structure number: | R0241 |
| Location: | 0.2 MI N OF JCT TH 92 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
| Total length: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
| Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
| Year built: | 1989 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 25 [as of 1986] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 100.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2018 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
| August 2016 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
| September 2014 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| November 2012 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| December 2010 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| October 2008 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| December 2006 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| December 2004 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| November 2002 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| November 2000 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| October 1999 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| October 1998 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 99.0 |
| October 1996 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
| December 1995 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
| December 1994 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
| October 1993 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
| September 1992 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
| October 1991 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 84 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1272538
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1272538