HAMPTON AVE over RVR DES PERES, UP RR, BN

Map

Coordinates:
+38.62154, -90.28824
38°37'18" N, 90°17'18" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	HAMPTON AVE over RVR DES PERES, UP RR, BN
Structure number:	12429
Old structure number:	U387510006 115 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	S 20 T 44 N R 6 E
Purpose:	Carries highway over railroad and waterway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	122.1 ft. `[37.2 m]`
Total length:	848.1 ft. `[258.5 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	71.9 ft. `[21.9 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	87.9 ft. `[26.8 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	19.7 ft. `[6.0 m]`
Skew angle:	23°
Owner:	City or Municipal Highway Agency `[04]`
Year built:	1986
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Steel continuous `[4]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) `[1]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	44,150 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	5% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Superior to present desirable criteria `[9]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	79.4
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$7,351,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
April 2017	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	44150	79.4
April 2015	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	44150	79.4
April 2013	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	44150	79.4
March 2011	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	44150	79.4
April 2009	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	44150	80.4
May 2007	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Satisfactory	44150	80.4
April 2005	Fair	Satisfactory	Very Good	Very Good	44150	91.8
April 2003	Fair	Satisfactory	Very Good	Very Good	44000	91.8
August 2001	Fair	Satisfactory	Very Good	Very Good	44000	93.8
June 1999	Fair	Satisfactory	Very Good	Very Good	44000	91.7
June 1991	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	36482	95.2

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	2,914	2,248	666	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	2,200	1,902	225	73	0
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	6,033	6,033	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	529	493	36	0	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	64,380	0	64,380	0	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	60,624	0	60,624	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	54	48	5	1	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall	linear ft.	342	317	25	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	248	188	55	5	0
Concrete Protective Coating	sq. ft.	1,700	850	850	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	836	629	203	4	0
Joints
Strip Seal Joint	linear ft.	190	95	0	0	95
Pourable Joint	linear ft.	176	88	81	7	0
Bearings
Movable Bearing	each	30	28	2	0	0
Enclosed/Concealed Bearing	each	168	144	12	12	0
Fixed Bearing	each	10	10	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	1,684	0	842	842	0