+38.42862, -90.39650
38°25'43" N, 90°23'47" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:12623
Old structure number:0157002 050 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 25 T 43 N R 6 E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:44.3 ft. [13.5 m]
Total length:46.9 ft. [14.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Skew angle:11°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1978
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2017 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:3,100 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:37.6 tons [34.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:22.8 tons [20.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:52.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$270,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
March 201752.5FairSatisfactoryFairFairFO3100
March 201549.3FairSatisfactoryFairFairFO3100
March 201359.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO3100
March 201159.6FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO3100
February 200959.6FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO3100
March 200759.6FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO3100
March 200559.6FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO3100
March 200359.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO3100
February 200159.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO3100
December 199859.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO3100
March 199759.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO3100
January 199559.6GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO3100
February 199360.7FairSatisfactoryGoodVery GoodFO3000
January 199160.7FairSatisfactoryGoodVery GoodFO3000