COUNTY RD 550 over ALDER BR
Map
Coordinates:
+37.81926, -94.0177737°49'09" N, 94°01'04" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY RD 550 over ALDER BR |
Structure number: | 15108 |
Old structure number: | 085R014 020 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 9 T 35 N R 28 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Total length: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1950 |
Year reconstructed: | 1981 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 38.7 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $143,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 38.7 |
December 2016 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 38.7 |
December 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 38.7 |
December 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 38.7 |
December 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 38.7 |
April 2009 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 100 | 38.7 |
February 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 38.7 |
February 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 38.7 |
January 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 38.7 |
February 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 38.7 |
February 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 38.7 |
November 1991 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 100 | 37.7 |