Share: 
COUNTY RD 177 over S FABIUS RVR
Map
Coordinates:
+39.92800, -91.86350
39°55'41" N, 91°51'49" W
+39.92800, -91.86350
39°55'41" N, 91°51'49" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY RD 177 over S FABIUS RVR |
| Structure number: | 16150 |
| Location: | S 11 T 59 N R 9 W |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
| Total length: | 130.9 ft. [39.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1910 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2018] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 40.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $535,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 2018 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 50 | 40.0 |
| March 2016 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 50 | 40.0 |
| March 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 49.3 |
| March 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 52.3 |
| May 2010 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 48.4 |
| May 2008 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 48.4 |
| April 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 48.4 |
| April 2004 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 48.4 |
| March 2002 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 47.9 |
| February 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 35 | 36.9 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1276780
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1276780