COUNTY RD 5120 over LIT DRY FK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.90120, -91.7308037°54'04" N, 91°43'51" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY RD 5120 over LIT DRY FK |
Structure number: | 17279 |
Old structure number: | 1470010 081 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 30 T 37 N R 7 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
Total length: | 68.9 ft. [21.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 11.8 ft. [3.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 13.8 ft. [4.2 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 30 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 47.7 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $316,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 30 | 47.7 |
March 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 30 | 44.7 |
February 2014 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 30 | 44.7 |
February 2012 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 30 | 28.7 |
March 2011 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 30 | 28.7 |
May 2009 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 30 | 28.7 |
February 2007 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 30 | 44.7 |
December 2004 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 30 | 44.7 |
February 2003 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 54.8 |
January 2001 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 54.7 |
May 1999 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 54.7 |
February 1991 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 51.7 |