+38.28759, -90.49782
38°17'15" N, 90°29'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:19407
Old structure number:J- 89 050 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 907 T 41 N R 5 E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:81.0 ft. [24.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:17.8 tons [16.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:49.6
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$359,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
January 201749.6PoorFairPoorFairSD200
January 201562.1PoorFairPoorFairSD200
January 201370.9PoorFairSatisfactoryPoorSD200
February 201187.9FairGoodSatisfactoryFair-200
February 200987.9FairGoodSatisfactoryFair-200
February 200787.9FairGoodSatisfactoryFair-200
February 200587.9FairGoodGoodFair-200
February 200398.9GoodGoodGoodGood-200
February 200198.9GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good-200
December 199898.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-200
February 199198.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-100