COUNTY RD 323 over CUIVRE RVR
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+39.20203, -91.2209739°12'07" N, 91°13'15" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY RD 323 over CUIVRE RVR |
Structure number: | 19951 |
Old structure number: | 2410017 082 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | S 11 T 51 N R 3 W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
Total length: | 90.9 ft. [27.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 11.5 ft. [3.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
Average daily traffic: | 30 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Critical [2 out of 9] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 17.6 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $402,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2016 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Critical | 30 | 17.6 |
July 2014 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 30 | 17.6 |
August 2013 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 30 | 18.7 |
July 2012 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 30 | 18.7 |
March 2012 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 30 | 18.7 |
September 2010 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 30 | 18.7 |
September 2008 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 30 | 31.5 |
September 2006 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 30 | 31.5 |
September 2004 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 30 | 31.5 |
August 2002 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 30 | 31.5 |
August 2000 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 30 | 31.5 |
September 1998 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 15 | 30.5 |
December 1990 | Poor | Good | Fair | Poor | 15 | 31.5 |